Friday, February 10, 2012


In “O Magnum Mysterium,” Tomas Luis De Victoria Primarily uses Polyphonic texture.  The genre of this piece is a motet.  Motets usually have three or four voices; each one with its own distinct melody on either the same text or different text.  The beginning of the piece is fugal where the melody begins in measure 1 but is followed by the next voice six beats later but a perfect 5th below the original melody.  This piece can be analyzed with common practices because it’s entirely tonal.  Sometimes in this piece, the voices break the rules of common practices, by allowing parallel 5ths and octaves.  This is characteristic of the time period where Polyphony was still the most common style of composing.  When the piece becomes homo-rhythmic, the chords feel much stronger and the polyphony is much more present.  The Bass is the most prominent voice in the piece.  It may not be the “main” melody, but it is a solid foundation while also pushing the piece forward.  Although it mainly stays on scale degrees 1 and 5, the bass motion is what fuels the melodic line as the piece cadences.  The way he blends the voices and the harmonies that he creates gives the piece that “spiritual” or “holy” feeling.  The words of this piece would lead one to believe that this piece would be sacred and sung only in the church, but the beauty and style of the polyphony he uses suggests that it may also have been sung secularly at home by the people.

2 comments:

  1. Round 2:

    We've been talking about motets in class a lot lately, but I want you to look up the grove article on the motet so that you understand the history of the genre, and how it changes over time.

    Again, make sure you use the term "imitative" rather than "fugal." Indeed, this piece alternates between imitative polyphony and more chordal, homorhythmic polyphony. Something that you might think about doing for your paper is isolating the parts that are imitated, and show them apart from the rest of the score so that we can see just how many melodies are imitated, and what those melodies look like, and the text that he is setting that requires such a style.

    When you say that this piece is entirely tonal, what exactly do you mean? Can this piece really be analyzed using common-practice (roman numeral-based) theory? This is not really a time when composers were thinking in terms of "tonality" per se, but really more in terms of mode.

    Also, I do you have a source telling you that the use of parallel 5ths was common during this time? Post-Palestrina polyphony really shouldn't have parallel 5ths. Where does Victoria use these, specifically, if he does in fact use them? This would be a pretty extraordinary thing, and would certainly say something either about the text, Victoria, or where he was composing.

    What does it mean for the polyphony to be "much more present" in the homorhythmic sections? Talk through this, and try to solidify your idea and what you really want to say here. I think if you continue talking it through and finding the best words for your descriptions, you will be able to find a more exact way of saying this.

    I'm really interested in this idea of the bass. What notes does that part sing most often? Does this say anything about mode?

    Read through the write-up of the piece in the anthology - I think you'll find some of Burkholder's analysis enlightening :-)

    Thanks again for getting all of this up! Keep pushing through! Great work!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh! One other thing that I just remembered you talked about but that I didn't address adequately... You mentioned that each beat contains a quarter note, but this isn't necessarily true. The last beat of of m. 5, 10, 16, 20 etc. isn't made explicit through any note beginning at that time. It looks like there are some beat 2's that are also not in some way "made clear" by any note on the beat. Now, these examples are all on weak beats. I haven't looked through at every measure to see if there are other examples, but you should probably take a closer look at this. I think you're on to something there, but maybe not what you had in mind.

    ReplyDelete